Friday 15 Podcast

Is Digital Penetration a Good Measure of eCommerce Success?

Brian Beck and Andy Hoar examine whether percentage of revenue from ecommerce is the right success metric, with 58% of practitioners saying it can be misleading.

Friday 15 Podcast

Key takeaways

  • A Master B2B LinkedIn poll found 58% of practitioners believe percentage of revenue from ecommerce can be misleading, while 42% said it reveals digital maturity and success.
  • Deirdre Head from Boston Scientific noted that accounts may order more overall due to ecommerce usage even when they do not order through ecommerce directly, requiring analytics gymnastics to capture.
  • Dan Stepchew from Zest Dental Solutions cautioned against framing ecommerce as the best channel for demand generation when it may be better suited for demand capture.
  • Peter DiDomenica from American Orthodontics noted he could argue 100% of sales come from ecommerce since inside sales enter orders through the site where the product configurator lives.
  • Practitioners suggested alternative metrics including percentage of transaction volume, customer adoption rates, engagement alongside platform impact on operations, and customer lifetime value.

Amazon ruled a distributor

The Consumer Products Safety Commission ordered Amazon to issue full refunds for 400,000 hazardous products sold through its marketplace. Products include carbon monoxide detectors and hair dryers without electrocution protection. This follows a ruling that classified Amazon as a distributor rather than just a platform connecting buyers and sellers. The hosts noted this could open Amazon to lawsuit liability beyond federal enforcement, representing a significant precedent for marketplace accountability.

The default metric

Percentage of total revenue from ecommerce became the default success metric because it is easy to calculate and understand. If total sales are $100 million and ecommerce sales are $3 million, the number is 3%. Early digital leaders justified their existence by pointing to these numbers. Senior executives can understand it. But ease of calculation does not make it the right metric for understanding digital success.

We see so much usage of ecommerce for everything but ordering. An account may order more from us due to their usage of ecommerce because of better product information and accurate inventory status.

Deirdre Head, Boston Scientific

The misleading majority

A LinkedIn poll asked whether percentage of B2B company revenue from ecommerce is a good measure of success. Results showed 58% said no, it can be misleading, while 42% said yes, it reveals digital maturity and success. The hosts noted this represents reasonable disagreement, with the answer depending on context. The comments generated significant discussion about alternative approaches.

Cross-channel complexity

Deirdre Head from Boston Scientific noted that accounts may order more overall due to ecommerce usage even when they do not order through ecommerce directly. Better product information, accurate inventory status, and pricing drive behavior that results in offline orders. Matt Wingham from Cardinal Health previously shared similar challenges: customers research on the website but order through EDI. Connecting these touchpoints requires sophisticated analytics.

Definition challenges

Peter DiDomenica from American Orthodontics raised the definition challenge. He could argue 100% of sales come from ecommerce since inside sales enter orders through the site where the product configurator and customer prescriptions live. He separates into three buckets: punch-out and EDI, orders placed directly by customers, and internal user orders. 3M faced similar definitional issues, changing whether EDI counted as ecommerce from year to year.

At the end of the day I think this is a metric you have to put in the context of your customer and understand the role that ecommerce and digital plays in the journey.

Brian Beck, Master B2B

Demand capture versus generation

Dan Stepchew from Zest Dental Solutions offered another perspective. He asked what happens when total direct sales revenue is flat. Does it mean ecommerce only converted existing customers without incremental impact, or that ecommerce did its job while sales underperformed? He frames ecommerce as best suited for demand capture rather than demand generation, suggesting this is the most profitable approach from an operating expense standpoint.

Alternative metrics

Jeff Mikos from McFadden suggested leaning into adoption and engagement alongside platform impact on operations: percentage of customers registered, whether they are active, what they do when logged in. Ricardo Caruso suggested percentage of transaction volume rather than revenue, since B2B environments can make revenue deceptive. The hosts noted that customer lifetime value, share of wallet, and sales team effectiveness also deserve attention.

Context determines value

The hosts concluded the metric should be part of the puzzle but not the sole measure. For leading distributors like Grainger and MSC with high digital penetration, the correlation with maturity is clear. For manufacturers with complex products requiring consultation, low online transaction rates may not indicate failure. Bank of America still reports digital penetration publicly, suggesting investors value the information. The danger is focusing on it blindly and forcing customers into ecommerce when that does not serve their needs.

Frequently asked questions

Is percentage of revenue from ecommerce a good success metric?

A Master B2B LinkedIn poll found 58% of practitioners believe this metric can be misleading, while 42% said it reveals digital maturity and success. The hosts concluded it depends on understanding your customer. If customers want to transact online, high percentages indicate success. But for complex products requiring consultation, low online transaction rates may not indicate failure if digital influences the overall sale.

Why can ecommerce percentage be misleading?

Deirdre Head from Boston Scientific explained that accounts may order more overall due to ecommerce usage even when they do not order through ecommerce directly. Better product information, accurate inventory status, and pricing drive behavior that results in offline orders. This cross-channel influence is hard to measure, requiring what she called analytics gymnastics to capture. The simple percentage misses this impact.

What alternative metrics should B2B companies consider?

Practitioners suggested several alternatives: percentage of transaction volume rather than revenue (Ricardo Caruso), customer adoption and engagement rates (Jeff Mikos), share of wallet, customer lifetime value, and sales team effectiveness. Peter DiDomenica separates orders into three buckets: punch-out and EDI, orders placed directly by customers, and internal user orders. This provides more nuanced understanding than a single percentage.

How does this apply to manufacturers versus distributors?

The hosts noted that leading distributors like Grainger and MSC have high digital penetration reflecting genuine digital maturity. For manufacturers, the picture is more complex. Some manufacturers claim channel partner ecommerce as their own, which the hosts consider misleading. A manufacturer enabling distributors with better data is not the same as the manufacturer doing ecommerce. Context matters for interpreting the metric.

What did practitioners say about defining ecommerce?

Peter DiDomenica from American Orthodontics raised the definition challenge. He could argue 100% of sales come from ecommerce since inside sales enter orders through the site where the product configurator and customer prescriptions live. But that does not mean all sales are customer-initiated online orders. Companies must carefully define what counts as ecommerce before measuring it.

Should B2B companies still track digital penetration percentage?

The hosts concluded it should be part of the puzzle but not the sole metric. Bank of America still publicly reports digital transaction percentages in the 60% range, suggesting investors value this information. For companies where customers want to transact digitally, high correlation exists between this metric and digital maturity. The danger is focusing on it blindly and trying to force customers into ecommerce when that does not serve their needs.

Sources & methodology

  1. Friday 15 Podcast, Master B2B
  2. Master B2B LinkedIn poll, January 2025
  3. Deirdre Head, Boston Scientific
  4. Dan Stepchew, Zest Dental Solutions
  5. Peter DiDomenica, American Orthodontics
  6. Jeff Mikos, McFadden
  7. Ricardo Caruso, practitioner comment
Andy Hoar Andy Hoar
Co-Founder, Master B2B

Andy is a Co-Founder of Master B2B, founder of Paradigm B2B and author of the book Bot2Bot: The New Future of B2B Commerce. Andy is one of the leading global authorities on B2B commerce strategy.

Brian Beck Brian Beck
Co-Founder, Master B2B

Brian is a co-founder of Master B2B, Managing Partner of Amazon agency Enceiba, and author of the book "Billion Dollar B2B Ecommerce." Brian has also been C-level digital commerce executive with two decades of experience.

New: B2B Exchange at Shoptalk Presented by Master B2B

X