Friday 15 Podcast

Metrics Month: Is Customer Lifetime Value the Best Measure of Ecommerce Success?

Brian Beck and Andy Hoar examine whether customer lifetime value is the single best metric for B2B ecommerce success, finding that 73% of practitioners say it falls short despite theoretical appeal.

Friday 15 Podcast

Key takeaways

  • A Master B2B LinkedIn poll found 73% of practitioners said customer lifetime value is not the single best measure of ecommerce success, despite 56% choosing it as the best option in a prior poll.
  • Customer lifetime value calculations require estimating how long customers will remain active, but retention rates are increasingly unpredictable in a world where loyalty is declining and buying habits change rapidly.
  • Many B2B companies cannot build a 360-degree view of the customer across all touchpoints, making accurate CLV calculations impossible when order data exists in silos.
  • The hosts recommended using multiple metrics together and aligning with what the CFO wants to see, since every business has different measurement capabilities and leadership expectations.
  • Honeywell announced a split into three separate companies, following a trend of activist investor pressure to unlock enterprise value locked up in conglomerates.

Honeywell splits into three companies

Honeywell announced a split into three separate companies, following a trend of activist investor pressure on conglomerates. The hosts attributed this to the private equity approach of unlocking enterprise value: investors argue the sum of the parts is worth more than the whole. GE did this in 2021 and GE Aerospace went up roughly 4X. Alcoa did a similar split in 2016 and went sideways. The hosts noted that B2B companies often acquire adjacent businesses over decades, then wake up one morning asking what business they are in with 27 different units.

Continuing metrics month

The episode continued a series on B2B ecommerce metrics. A prior poll found 58% of practitioners said percentage of revenue from ecommerce can be misleading. When asked which metric best captures the true influence of ecommerce, 56% chose customer lifetime value over share of wallet, average order value, and profitability per order. But does that make CLV the single best measure of success?

Customer lifetime value is a great metric in theory. It’s a very difficult metric in reality, but a very necessary one.

Andy Hoar, Master B2B

The CLV formula

Customer lifetime value combines annual spend, purchase frequency, and estimated customer lifespan. The first two components are straightforward to measure. The third is where complexity begins: how do you estimate whether a customer will stay one year, five years, or ten years? In a world where loyalty is declining and the son who took over may shop on his phone without knowing the 800 number, historical retention rates may not predict future behavior.

The virtues of CLV

CLV has clear advantages. It considers both revenue and time frame, providing a longer-term perspective than point-in-time metrics. This matters for customer acquisition cost calculations: you need to know how long customers will stick around to understand how much you can spend acquiring them. When profitability is included, CLV can focus on profit rather than just revenue, though this requires cost data that many companies lack.

Measurement challenges

The hosts identified serious practical challenges. Many B2B companies cannot measure average customer lifetime when retention rates are increasingly unpredictable. Complete and accurate customer order data across all touchpoints often does not exist. The ability to create cohorts and understand cross-channel behaviors requires systems designed for this analysis. And tying digital investment costs back to individual customers for profitability calculations requires allocation decisions that most companies have not made.

You have to go to your boss and ask what is the thing that they want to see. What are the things that he or she thinks are the best ways to measure this stuff?

Brian Beck, Master B2B

Practitioner perspectives

Dan Stepchew from Zest Dental Solutions called CLV the Holy Grail of metrics when combined with cost of goods sold and cost of delivery. He recommended comparing CLV against orders from other channels to measure incremental improvement. The hosts agreed this is the right approach but noted the cost side is difficult to measure: how do you allocate trade show expenses, advertising spend, and sales commissions to individual customers?

The poll results

A LinkedIn poll asked whether customer lifetime value is the single best measure of success. The results: 73% said no, while 27% said yes. The hosts noted this followed a poll where 56% chose CLV as the best option among limited choices. The contradiction makes sense: CLV is the best available metric, but it still falls short of being sufficient on its own.

Use multiple metrics

The hosts concluded that no single metric captures full ecommerce success. They recommended using multiple metrics together and aligning with what the CFO wants to see, since every business has different measurement capabilities and leadership expectations. Traditional ecommerce metrics like conversion rate still provide value for understanding channel performance. Jordan Jewell argued that customer satisfaction scores may matter most: if customers are happy and consistently spending, that first part of the equation matters regardless of complex calculations.

Frequently asked questions

Is customer lifetime value the single best measure of ecommerce success?

A Master B2B LinkedIn poll found 73% of practitioners said no, customer lifetime value is not the single best measure, while 27% said yes. This followed a prior poll where 56% chose CLV as the best option among limited choices. The hosts concluded that CLV is valuable in theory but falls short in practice due to measurement challenges around customer retention, profitability data, and cross-channel visibility.

What are the main challenges with measuring customer lifetime value?

The hosts identified several challenges: estimating average customer lifetime when retention rates are increasingly unpredictable, lacking complete and accurate customer order data across all touchpoints, inability to create cohorts and understand cross-channel behaviors, and difficulty tying digital investment costs back to individual customer profitability. Many B2B companies cannot build a 360-degree view of the customer needed for accurate CLV calculations.

Why is Honeywell splitting into three companies?

Honeywell is splitting into three separate companies following pressure from activist investors who argue the sum of the parts is worth more than the whole. GE did this in 2021 and GE Aerospace went up roughly 4X in value. However, Alcoa did a similar split in 2016 and went sideways. The hosts attributed this trend to the private equity approach of unlocking enterprise value in conglomerates that have acquired adjacent businesses over decades.

How should B2B companies approach ecommerce metrics?

The hosts recommended using multiple metrics together rather than relying on any single measure. They suggested having a conversation with the CFO to understand what metrics leadership finds persuasive, since every business is different and has different measurement capabilities. Traditional ecommerce metrics like conversion rate and average order value still provide value for understanding channel performance even if they do not capture full business impact.

What did practitioners say about measuring CLV?

Dan Stepchew from Zest Dental Solutions called CLV the Holy Grail of metrics when combined with cost of goods sold and cost of delivery. He recommended comparing CLV apples to apples against orders placed through other channels to measure incremental improvement from the storefront. The hosts noted this is the right approach in theory but requires profitability data per customer that many companies lack.

Why do B2B companies struggle with CLV calculations?

The hosts noted that many B2B companies might know customer value accurately in one channel but not others. They may have historical data in their ERP but cannot connect it to digital touchpoints. Some cannot even estimate value because systems were not designed for this analysis. Jordan Jewell argued that customer satisfaction scores may matter more than complex CLV calculations since happy customers consistently spend money.

Sources & methodology

  1. Friday 15 Podcast, Master B2B
  2. Master B2B LinkedIn poll, February 2025
  3. Dan Stepchew, Zest Dental Solutions
  4. Jordan Jewell, practitioner comment
Andy Hoar Andy Hoar
Co-Founder, Master B2B

Andy is a Co-Founder of Master B2B, founder of Paradigm B2B and author of the book Bot2Bot: The New Future of B2B Commerce. Andy is one of the leading global authorities on B2B commerce strategy.

Brian Beck Brian Beck
Co-Founder, Master B2B

Brian is a co-founder of Master B2B, Managing Partner of Amazon agency Enceiba, and author of the book "Billion Dollar B2B Ecommerce." Brian has also been C-level digital commerce executive with two decades of experience.

New: B2B Exchange at Shoptalk Presented by Master B2B

X