Friday 15 Podcast

Can Research Analysts Stay Relevant in the Age of AI?

Brian Beck and Andy Hoar examine why analyst firm stocks have cratered, which parts of the research business AI can already do, and whether Gartner and Forrester are facing their Blockbuster moment.

Friday 15 Podcast

Key takeaways

  • Gartner's stock fell roughly 50% in 2025 and Forrester's dropped about 44%, signaling investor concern that AI is threatening the core research subscription model that accounts for 70% or more of their revenue.
  • AI tools can already produce short and long-form reports, build models and frameworks, and create comparison tables in minutes, covering much of what research analysts have traditionally delivered.
  • The advisory consulting side of analyst work, including inquiries, workshops, and contextual advice, remains more defensible because it requires understanding a company's specific situation, though that advantage may erode over time.
  • The hosts compared the situation to Blockbuster: analyst firms can either disrupt themselves by building AI-native delivery models, or risk being displaced by new entrants who do.
  • In a LinkedIn poll, 86% of respondents said AI will not replace research analysts as the primary source of guidance for B2B technology comparisons, suggesting practitioners still value human expertise for now.

ChatGPT moves into commerce

The hosts opened with news that OpenAI’s ChatGPT now lets users buy directly from Etsy, with Shopify integration coming next. Brian noted the parallel to Google Shopping and Meta’s commerce features, but pointed out that the intent signal is stronger when someone is already using ChatGPT to research a purchase. Amazon is not participating, choosing not to open its catalog to OpenAI’s platform.

Andy framed this as a three-way competition for the front end of commerce: Google, Amazon, and now ChatGPT, with Apple potentially joining through Siri and Apple Intelligence. The implication for B2B is that what starts in consumer commerce tends to show up in business purchasing within a few years.

Analyst firm stocks crater

The main topic was whether AI will replace research analysts. Andy opened with the numbers: Gartner’s stock was down roughly 50% in 2025, and Forrester’s was down about 44%. He noted that Gartner had been valued at over 30 billion dollars at its peak and was closer to 10 to 12 billion at the time of the episode.

This is not a coincidence. It is indicative of something.

Andy Hoar, Master B2B

Andy, who spent seven years running Forrester’s B2B e-commerce practice, offered a breakdown of what analysts do. The work falls into three buckets: research (reports, models, frameworks, surveys), advisory consulting (inquiries, working sessions, workshops, evaluations), and project consulting (longer strategic engagements). Research accounts for 70% or more of revenue at both Gartner and Forrester.

What AI can already do

The hosts walked through each area to assess where AI is a threat. On the research side, AI tools can already write short and long-form reports, build models and frameworks, and create comparison tables. ChatGPT with deep research can approximate what an analyst might take days or weeks to produce, delivering a first draft in minutes.

Andy noted that quality still matters. Homemade is still better than factory manufactured, as he put it. But for many buyers, good enough may be sufficient, especially when the alternative is a six-figure subscription.

Where humans still win

The advisory consulting side is more defensible. A 30-minute inquiry with an analyst who understands your specific context, knows the nuances of your industry, and can apply judgment about what is a fad versus what is real, is harder to replicate.

ChatGPT is not talking to people in the field. They are aggregating stuff. If I am working at an electrical distributor and I need to implement a PIM system, I kind of want to know how other electrical distributors are doing that.

Andy Hoar, Master B2B

However, Andy put an asterisk on this. He sees a future where companies talk to an AI agent that has been trained on an analyst firm’s proprietary data and presents itself as a named expert with a human-like persona. Whether that is three years away or ten, he considers it inevitable.

The Blockbuster analogy

Brian drew a comparison to Blockbuster, which was displaced by Netflix because it failed to shift to a new delivery model. Netflix then disrupted itself again, moving from DVDs by mail to streaming. The question is whether Gartner and Forrester will do the same, cannibalizing their own subscription research business to build AI-native products.

Andy mentioned his own e-Combine tool as a step in this direction: a self-service way for companies to compare e-commerce platforms. He noted that Forrester and Gartner have not done something similar, likely because it would cannibalize the wave and magic quadrant products that generate significant revenue.

This is their Blockbuster moment. Are they going to cannibalize themselves or be cannibalized?

Andy Hoar, Master B2B

Practitioners still trust humans

The hosts shared results from a LinkedIn poll asking whether AI will replace research analysts as the primary source of guidance for technology comparisons in B2B commerce. Of those who responded, 86% said no.

Brian interpreted this as a sign that practitioners still value human expertise and are skeptical that AI can deliver the contextual, nuanced advice they need. But he also noted that this could change as AI capabilities mature and as new entrants build analyst-like products designed from the ground up around AI delivery.

What this means for B2B leaders

The practical takeaway is that the value proposition of analyst firms is shifting. The research component, which has been the core of their business, is increasingly replicable by AI. The advisory and contextual components remain valuable but represent a smaller share of revenue and are harder to scale. For B2B leaders who rely on analyst guidance, the implication is to pay attention to where the real value is coming from and whether that value can be delivered faster or cheaper through new channels.

Frequently asked questions

Why have analyst firm stocks fallen so sharply?

Gartner's stock fell roughly 50% and Forrester's fell about 44% in 2025. The decline reflects investor concern that AI tools can now do much of what the research side of these businesses has traditionally offered: producing reports, building frameworks, summarizing trends, and creating comparison tables. Since research subscriptions account for 70% or more of revenue at these firms, even modest substitution by AI represents a significant threat to their business model.

What parts of an analyst's work can AI already do?

AI can produce short and long-form reports, build quantitative and qualitative models, create frameworks and workflows, and generate comparison tables and evaluations. Tools like ChatGPT with deep research capabilities can approximate much of this in minutes rather than the days or weeks an analyst might take. The quality may not always match human work, but for many use cases it is close enough to shift how buyers allocate their budgets.

Where do human analysts still have an advantage?

Human analysts are still stronger at advisory consulting: 30-minute inquiries, working sessions, and workshops that require understanding a company's specific context and applying judgment. They are also better at recognizing fads, understanding industry nuances, and interpreting what implementation looks like in the field. However, these higher-touch services represent a smaller share of revenue than research subscriptions.

What is the Blockbuster analogy the hosts used?

The hosts compared Gartner and Forrester to Blockbuster, which was displaced by Netflix because it did not shift to a new delivery model in time. They noted that Netflix disrupted itself twice, moving from DVDs by mail to streaming. The question is whether analyst firms will similarly cannibalize their own subscription research business to build AI-native products, or whether new entrants will do it for them.

Will agentic AI eventually replace analyst advisory work?

The hosts believe it is possible. They described a future where a company could talk to an AI agent that has been trained on an analyst firm's proprietary data and presents itself with a human-like persona. Whether that future is three years, five years, or ten years away is uncertain, but both hosts see it as a real possibility rather than speculation.

What did practitioners say in the poll about AI replacing analysts?

In a LinkedIn poll, 86% of respondents said AI will not replace research analysts as the primary source of guidance for technology comparisons in B2B commerce. This suggests that practitioners still trust human expertise and may be skeptical of AI's ability to deliver the nuanced, context-specific advice they need. However, the hosts noted that this could change as AI capabilities mature.

Sources & methodology

  1. Gartner and Forrester stock performance data, 2025
  2. OpenAI and Etsy, on chatbot shopping integration
  3. Friday 15 Podcast, Master B2B
Andy Hoar Andy Hoar
Co-Founder, Master B2B

Andy is a Co-Founder of Master B2B, founder of Paradigm B2B and author of the book Bot2Bot: The New Future of B2B Commerce. Andy is one of the leading global authorities on B2B commerce strategy.

Brian Beck Brian Beck
Co-Founder, Master B2B

Brian is a co-founder of Master B2B, Managing Partner of Amazon agency Enceiba, and author of the book "Billion Dollar B2B Ecommerce." Brian has also been C-level digital commerce executive with two decades of experience.

New: B2B Exchange at Shoptalk Presented by Master B2B

X